![]() So the basis for what DAW he uses should be rooted in what techniques he employs, and what options the program has available to execute them. While PT has extensive editing features.most of those features are not used or necessary for many people. Pro Tools I'll say if you used FL for beats and have been doing it for years you might not even like Pro Tools for the fact that FL has a quicker workflow that's more favored for beats and sound design. If you can make it work and have developed a workflow for you then by all means stick to it. Accidentally right-clicking your clip, hidden clip over clip, arming, punching in, arbitrary way of automation, using Edison and not being able to play in context with the rest of your audio/midi tracks until printed. I may get hate for this but FL Studio does not make it easy for you to record vocals and edit as to most traditional linear daws out there. Just got frustrated with switching back and forth amongst other reasons. You may be right at home if your used to a linear way of working though. The tools are there just the workflow is ehhh. Sounds tough the FL workflow seems better suited for beats more so midi and Pro Tools better suited for recording and editing audio.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |